A new survey by the Netherlands National Committee for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (NCad) has revealed that a substantial proportion of Dutch academics remain doubtful about the prospect of animal-free science.  

The consultation, held in early 2025, gathered 187 responses, including 123 individuals — most of them researchers at Dutch universities and institutes and constituting 73% of these respondents — and 64 organisations from varied backgrounds, including research, animal welfare, patient and policy bodies. 

The results show that 41% of respondents believe a society without animal experiments is not feasible, while a further 25% think it could only be achieved in multiple generations or were unsure. This means most surveyed people do not see animal-free science happening anytime soon or at all. 

Just 35% saw it as “approximately feasible” if major barriers are overcome. Neuroscientists and researchers in translational and safety testing were especially sceptical, citing the lack of complex alternatives to animal models. 

Opinions varied on transitioning away from animal testing. Some supported accelerated phase-out and increased investment, while others doubted the feasibility of such rapid changes.  

Public engagement sparked differing views, with some advocating for more involvement and others questioning the public’s current knowledge and media’s ability to transmit it. Some also argued that the public’s desire for this is a rhetorical tactic used to persuade stakeholders to quickly phase out animal research without any evidence of public support for it.  

Over half of respondents expressed willingness to attend upcoming stakeholder meetings, which will inform NCad’s Transition Policy Advice 2.0.