top of page

Animal research saves lives. So why do opponents say it is ineffective?
One of the most common statistics used by activists to justify why animal research should be phased out, or banned, is the frequently-quoted claim that ‘90% of animal tests are ineffective’. EARA discusses the truths and mistruths behind this statement and its variations.

News
Features


UK unveils strategy to accelerate reduction in the use of animals in science
The UK government has unveiled a new roadmap to accelerate the phase-out of animals used in science by supporting researchers to transition to alternative methods.Â
Kirk Leech
Nov 171 min read
Â


The Transmitter highlights the value of primate research in neuroscience
A recent opinion article in The Transmitter by US neuroscientists Cory Miller, from the University of California, San Diego, J. Anthony Movshon, from New York University, and Doris Tsao, from the University of California, Berkeley, raised concerns over the recent policy changes in Europe and the US that would scale back animal research – including in primates. Â
Helena Pinheiro
Nov 171 min read
Â


New EARA feature: Why are animals used in basic research?
EARA has published a new feature article exploring the vital role of animals in basic research and the advances in non-animal methods in this field.
Inês Serrenho
Oct 271 min read
Â


Not all probiotics help the gut
A study in the US has found that not all probiotic bacteria are beneficial after antibiotic treatment, with some types of probiotics...
Inês Serrenho
Aug 111 min read
Â
bottom of page

